According to @cookiedotfun, traders should distinguish between engagement-farming posts and posts backed by committed capital when assessing a project to improve signal quality and decision-making, source: @cookiedotfun. The comparison implies that skin-in-the-game disclosures can reflect higher conviction and potentially more trustworthy signals for entries, sizing, and risk management, source: @cookiedotfun. Actionable takeaway: prioritize content where posters show capital at risk over pure engagement metrics to reduce noise in idea generation, source: @cookiedotfun.

According to @cookiedotfun, airdrops that lack participant investment or engagement, referred to as 'skin in the game,' are less likely to drive meaningful adoption or sustained trading activity. When recipients have no stake, token utility and liquidity may suffer, which can lead to volatility and lower long-term value in the cryptocurrency market. This insight highlights the importance for traders to evaluate upcoming airdrops for mechanisms that encourage deeper user participation and commitment, as these factors often correlate with stronger post-airdrop market performance (source: @cookiedotfun).